CANKIRI KARATEKIN UNIVERSITY Bologna Information System


  • Course Information
  • Course Title Code Semester Laboratory+Practice (Hour) Pool Type ECTS
    Authors And Cities TDE550 SPRING 3+0 E 7
    Learning Outcomes
    1-Understands the distinctive roles of city descriptions in literary texts.
    2-Observes how the perception of the city in the works of different authors is reflected in terms of style, perspective and expression techniques.
    3-Follows the effects of the historical, architectural, social, political and cultural reflections of the cities on the perception of the city in the works of the authors.
    4-Reveals the relationship of the city views in the works of the authors, the elements of the city with the other elements of the work (character, time, plot, fiction, etc.).
  • ECTS / WORKLOAD
  • ActivityPercentage

    (100)

    NumberTime (Hours)Total Workload (hours)
    Course Duration (Weeks x Course Hours)14342
    Classroom study (Pre-study, practice)148112
    Assignments2012020
    Short-Term Exams (exam + preparation) 0000
    Midterm exams (exam + preparation)2012020
    Project0000
    Laboratory 0000
    Final exam (exam + preparation) 6013030
    0000
    Total Workload (hours)   224
    Total Workload (hours) / 30 (s)     7,47 ---- (7)
    ECTS Credit   7
  • Course Content
  • Week Topics Study Metarials
    1 Urban and urban image R1: (1-18); R2: (1-65)
    2 Relation Between Urban and Literary Text / Novel and City R3: (25-76); R4: (50-95)
    3 Relationship Between Author and City R5; R6: (25-58); R7: (1-42); R8: (1-80)
    4 Writer and Venue Selection R11: (23-29); R12: (337-347); R15; K!6
    5 Elements Affecting the Writer`s Place Choice SR4; SR5; R10: (262-277)
    6 Authors Spatial Tools SR6; SR7; R14: (8-19)
    7 Introduction to Text Review R9; R27: (18-150/151/152)
    8 Text Review 1. R18; R19; R13
    9 Text Review 2. R23; R17; SR1
    10 Text Review 3. R20; R21
    11 Text Review 4. R28; SR2
    12 Text Review 5. R22; SR3
    13 Text Review 6. R24; R26
    14 Text Review 6. R25
    Prerequisites -
    Language of Instruction Turkish
    Responsible Assoc. Prof. Dr. Serap ASLAN COBUTOĞLU
    Instructors

    1-)Doçent Dr. Serap Aslan Cobutoğlu

    Assistants -
    Resources R1- Lynch, Kevin (2011). Kent İmgesi. (Çev. İrem Başaran). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları. R2- Weber, Max (2000). Şehir, Modern Kentin Oluşumu. (Çev. Musa Ceylan). İstanbul: Bakış Yayınları. R3- Sennett, Richard (2002). Ten ve Taş Batı Uygarlığında Beden ve Şehir. (Çev. Tuncay Birkan). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. R4- Harvey, David (1946). Sosyal Adalet ve Şehir. (Çev. Mehmet Moralı). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. R5- Lefebvre, Henri (1991). The Production of Space, translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith, Oxford: Blackwell, USA. R6- Urry, John (1999). Mekânları Tüketmek, (Çev. Rahmi G. Öğdül). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. R7- Grosz, Elizabeth, vd. (1996). Yitik Ülke Masalları: Kimlik ve Yer Sorunsalı. (Çev. Türkan Yöney). İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınları. R8- Kılıçbay, Mehmet Ali (2000). Şehirler ve Kentler. İstanbul: İmge Kitabevi. R9- Cogito Dergisi (1996). Kent ve Kültürü, S. 8, İstanbul: YKY. R10- Barthes, Roland (1999). Göstergebilim ve Şehircilik, Göstergebilimsel Serüven içinde (ss. 262-277). (Çev. Mehmet Rifat-Sema Rifat). İstanbul: Kaf Yayınları. K11- Mitchell, Kenneth (1987). Landscape and Literature, Geography and Literature (A Meeting of the Disciplines), içinde (ss. 23-29). (Ed. William E. Mallory, Paul Simpson-Housley. New York: Syracuse University Press. R12- Pocock, D. C. (1981). Place and the Novelist, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, Vol. 6, No. 3, s. 337-347. R13- Rana, Aslanoğlu (1998). Kent, Kimlik, Küreselleşme, Bursa: Asa Yayınları. R14- Oktay, Derya (2011). Kent Kimliğine Bütüncül bir Bakış. idealkent, S.3, s. 8-19. R15- Alver, Köksal (2010). Steril Hayatlar. Ankara: Hece Yayınları. R16- Bachelard, Gaston (2008). Uzamın Poetikası. (Çev. Alp Tümertekin). İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları. R17- Benjamin, Walter (2002). Pasajlar. (Çev. Ahmet Cemal). İstanbul: YKY. R18- Hugo, Victor(1999). Notre Dame de Paris. (Çev. Nesrin Altınova). İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınları. R19- Flaubert, Gustave (2013). Duygusal Eğitim. (Çev. Cemal Süreya). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. R20- Tanpınar, Ahmet Hamdi (2009). Beş Şehir. İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları. R21- Tanpınar, Ahmet Hamdi (2006). Yaşadığım Gibi. İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları. R22- Mungan, Murathan (2014). Kadından Kentler. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. R23- Karaosmanoğlu, Yakup Kadri (2013). Ankara. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. R24- Tekin, Latife (2012). Berci Kristin Çöp Masalları. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. R25- Calvino, Italio (2015). Görünmez Kentler. İstanbul: YKY. R26- Cogito Dergisi (2016). Mekan ve Siyaset, S. 84, İstanbul: YKY. R27- Şehirlerin Dili Özel Sayısı, Hece Dergisi, S. 18-150/151/152. R28- Gürsel, Nedim (2011). Resimli Dünya. İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.
    Supplementary Book SR1- Chambers, Iain (2005). Göç, Kültür, Kimlik. (Çev. İsmail Türkmen ve Mehmet Beşikçi). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yay. SR2- Bilgin, Nuri (2007). Kimlik İnşası. Ankara: Aşina Kitaplar. SR3- Emre, Akif (1997). Göstergeler. İstanbul: İz Yay. SR4- İdealkent / Kent Araştırmaları Dergisi SR5- Ö. Uğurlu vd.,(der. (2013).) Kent Sosyolojisi Çalışmaları. İstanbul: Örgün Yay. SR6- Alkan, Ayten (der.) (2009). Cins Cins Mekan. İstanbul: Varlık Yay. SR7- Şentürer, Ayşe vd. (yay. haz.). (2008). Zaman-Mekan. İstanbul: Yem Yay.
    Goals To show in which forms and tecniques the cities are processednin literary texts, To emphasize the implications of the authors on the cities To examine the contexts in which literary texts reflect the historical, social, cultural and physical characteristics of cities, To identify the cultural codes that contribute to the urban image in literary texts, Problematize the issue of city writing.
    Content Urban and urban image, Relation Between Urban and Literary Text , Relationship Between Author and City, Writer and Venue Selection, Elements Affecting the Writer`s Place Choice, Authors Spatial Tools and Text Rewiew.
  • Program Learning Outcomes
  • Program Learning Outcomes Level of Contribution
    1 Based on undergraduate qualifications, they develop and deepen their knowledge in the same or a different field at the level of expertise. -
    2 Uses the theoretical and applied knowledge at the level of expertise acquired in the field of Turkish Language and Literature. 3
    3 Can follow the technological developments at the level required by the field of Turkish language and literature and use computer technologies. -
    4 Knows the historical phases of Turkish Language and Literature and gains the ability to conduct studies accordingly. -
    5 Gains the ability to access resources and use resources without intermediaries in the scientific studies to be done in the field of Turkish Language and Literature. -
    6 Gains the ability to participate in various projects, to use the acquired knowledge, to analyze, interpret and evaluate. 3
    7 Can use scientific research and study methods related to the field. 3
    8 Creates solutions and new knowledge by combining the knowledge she has acquired in her field with the knowledge from different disciplines. 4
    9 Gains the ability to work individually or in groups in the field and gains the ability to express and communicate ideas. -
    10 Have enough foreign language knowledge to follow current developments and information in the field and communicate with colleagues. -
    11 Gains the ability to develop new approaches for the solution of complex and unpredictable problems encountered in applications related to the field. -
    12 Have a sense of professional and ethical responsibility in the field. -
    Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi  Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı  @   2017 - Webmaster