Week
|
Topics
|
Study Metarials
|
1
|
Introduction
|
R2: CHAPTER 1
|
2
|
Security Concept and Collective Security
|
R2: CHAPTER 1
|
3
|
Collective Security Trials in the Pre-Cold War Period
|
R2: CHAPTER 2
|
4
|
Collective Security in the Two-Pole World: Nato and the Warsaw Pact during the Cold War
|
R3: CHAPTER 1
|
5
|
Collective Security in the Post-Cold War Period and NATO`s Transformation
|
R2: CHAPTER 3
|
6
|
Post-Cold War Threat Perceptions: Balkans and NATO
|
R4: CHAPTER 1
|
7
|
A New Era in NATO Security Approaches: Afghanistan and Iraq
|
R1: CHAPTER 1
|
8
|
Maritime Safety and NATO: Mediterranean, and Gulf of Aden
|
R2: CHAPTER 5
|
9
|
Humanitarian Interventions and NATO: Libya and Syria
|
R2: CHAPTER 6; R2: CHAPTER 7
|
10
|
Current Period Russian Federation and NATO Relations: Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Ukraine
|
R4: CHAPTER 3
|
11
|
Hybrid War and NATO
|
R4: CHAPTER 5
|
12
|
NATO and Turkey Relations
|
R1: CHAPTER 4; R2: CHAPTER 8; R4: CHAPTER 5
|
13
|
The Future of NATO
|
R4: CHAPTER 6
|
14
|
Conclusion and Evaluation
|
R2: CHAPTER 9
|
Prerequisites
|
-
|
Language of Instruction
|
Turkish
|
Responsible
|
Assoc. Prof. Emrah ÖZDEMİR
Asst. Prof. Ali Samir MERDAN
|
Instructors
|
1-)Doktor Öğretim Üyesi Ali Samir Merdan
|
Assistants
|
-
|
Resources
|
R1: Rynning, S. (2012). NATO in Afghanistan: the Liberal Disconnect. Stanford University Press.
R2: Yost, D. S. (1998). NATO Transformed: the Alliance`s New Roles in International Security. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
R3: Williams, M. J. (2011). Sustainable Peacebuilding: NATO?s Suitability for Post-conflict Reconstruction in Multi-actor Environments. Global Governance, 17 (1), 115-134.
R4: Thies, W. (2009). Why NATO Endures. Cambridge University Press.
|
Supplementary Book
|
-
|
Goals
|
The aim of this course is to examine the emergence and transformation of collective security through NATO.
|
Content
|
The course will focus on security approaches and collective security initiatives. In this context, the transformation of NATO and its changing perceptions of security will be examined.
|
|
Program Learning Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
1
|
Describes the theoretical and applied knowledge of the field of international relations in depth.
|
3
|
2
|
Interprets basic international problems and current international developments with an interdisciplinary approach.
|
-
|
3
|
Follows the scientific literature and current sources in the field of international relations.
|
-
|
4
|
It develops strategy and policy recommendations based on theoretical approaches and research on international problems.
|
-
|
5
|
Describes the theoretical and applied knowledge of the field of international relations in depth
|
-
|
6
|
Uses the computer technologies necessary to conduct research, obtain and share information.
|
3
|
7
|
Uses acceptable diplomatic and academic English.
|
-
|
8
|
He/she can work individually and as a team member to solve problems arising in international relations.
|
2
|
9
|
It supports the universality of social and cultural rights, gains awareness of social justice, and protects the historical and cultural heritage.
|
4
|
10
|
He/she effectively conveys his/her views, research, and analysis on international relations to the public and higher authorities in written, oral and visual forms.
|
-
|