|
Program Learning Outcomes |
Level of Contribution |
|
1
|
Recognize the basic concepts and problems related to Philosophy and Religious Studies and make comparative evaluations on them.
|
-
|
|
2
|
Have sufficient knowledge about the literature created in different sub-disciplines of Philosophy and Religious Sciences.
|
-
|
|
3
|
Gain the ability to write academic works in accordance with scientific research techniques and ethics on their own and as a team.
|
-
|
|
4
|
Understand and analyze classical and modern sources in the field of Philosophy and Religious Studies and use them in academic studies.
|
-
|
|
5
|
Reason analytically and categorically in the field of Philosophy and Religious Studies and produce new information from existing knowledge.
|
-
|
|
6
|
Gain the ability to conduct interdisciplinary research and evaluation.
|
-
|
|
7
|
Convey the researches in Philosophy and Religious Sciences in a systematic and coherent way, either orally or in writing.
|
-
|
|
8
|
Conduct research and offer suggestions that can produce solutions to social needs and problems related to Philosophy and Religious Sciences.
|
-
|
|
9
|
Determine the authenticity and resource value of the information in the field of Philosophy and Religious Sciences.
|
-
|
|
10
|
Understand the historical development and stages of Philosophy and Religious Sciences.
|
-
|
|
11
|
Gain the ability to acquire the knowledge of the field of Philosophy and Religious Sciences, to use the knowledge in place and to apply it to new formations.
|
-
|
|
12
|
Learn how to use the knowledge obtained in the field of Philosophy and Religious Sciences in order to raise the education, culture and art level of the society.
|
-
|
|
13
|
Support current developments and ongoing projects in the field of Philosophy and Religious Sciences with quantitative and qualitative data.
|
-
|
|
14
|
Gain the ability to pose, develop, defend and express philosophical problems both orally and in writing.
|
-
|
|
15
|
Gain the ability to relate philosophical problems and issues from historical and theoretical perspectives.
|
-
|