TR ENG

CANKIRI KARATEKIN UNIVERSITY Bologna Information System

Course Information

Course Information

Course Content

Course's Contribution to Prog.

ECTS Workload in Relation

ECTS- Workload Calculation Tool

Program Information

Mission and Vision

Program Learning Outcomes

Course Struct. & ECTS Credits

Course Catalogs

Course & Program L. Outcomes

TYYC Level Qualification

TYYC Core Area Competencies

Admission Requirements

Access to Further Studies

Qualification Awarded

Final Examination

Assessment and Grading

Head of Dept. & Coord.

Görüş Bildir Print
  • Course Information
    • Course Title Code Semester Laboratory+Practice (Hour) Pool Type ECTS
    European Union Politics ULS514 FALL-SPRING 3+0 Fac./ Uni. E 7
    Learning Outcomes
    1-Analysis the EU crises and the developments in a theoretical framework.
    2-Evaluates the historical developments, institutional structure and policy making of the EU, taking into account the current developments.
    3-Interprets the reasons of the developments regarding the deepening and widening of the EU.
  • ECTS / WORKLOAD
    • ActivityPercentage

    (100)

    		NumberTime (Hours)Total Workload (hours)
    Course Duration (Weeks x Course Hours)14342
    Classroom study (Pre-study, practice)14456
    Assignments0000
    Short-Term Exams (exam + preparation) 0000
    Midterm exams (exam + preparation)4014545
    Project0000
    Laboratory 0000
    Final exam (exam + preparation) 5015050
    1011010
    Total Workload (hours)   203
    Total Workload (hours) / 30 (s)     6,77 ---- (7)
    ECTS Credit   7
  • Course Content
    • Week Topics Study Metarials
    1 Theories of European Integration (I) Supranationalist and Intergovernmentalist Theories R1.R2.R3.
    2 Theories of European Integration (II) Rationalist and Constructivist Theories R1.R2.R3.
    3 Basics and main European Union Developments- I (1950s-1990s) R1.
    4 Main European Union Developments- II-(1990s-until today) R1.
    5 Institutions of the European Union R4
    6 Policy Making in the European Union-Case Study: Common Foreign and Security Policy R5.
    7 Crises of the European Union : I) Brexit Issue R6.
    8 Crises of the European Union : II) Migration Crisis R7.
    9 Crises of the European Union : III) Euro Crisis R8.
    10 Crises of the European Union : IV) Democratic Deficit in the EU R9.
    11 Crises of the European Union : V) Euroscepticism, Rise Of Populism and Far Right Parties in the EU R10.
    12 European Union Enlargement,: Achievements and Challenges R11.
    13 European Neighbourhood Policy Developments R12.
    14 Differentiated (Flexible) Integration in the EU R13.
    Prerequisites -
    Language of Instruction Turkish
    Responsible Assoc. Prof. Hatice Yazgan
    Instructors -
    Assistants -
    Resources R1. Dinan, D. (2007). Fifty Years of European Integration: A Remarkable Achievement?, Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 31, Issue 5, R2- Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2002). Theorizing EU enlargement: Research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research?, Journal of European Public Policy 9:4, 500-528, R3. Akgül A.S. (2004). ?Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri Işığında Avrupa Bütünleşmesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 1, Sayı 1, s. 1-32, R.4 European Union, EU Institutions and Bodies, https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/institutions-bodies_en, R5. Aydın Düzgit, S. (2018). Avrupa Birliği?nin Dış İlişkilerinde Kuramsal Tartışmalar, Sanem Baykal et. al., (Der.), Hukuki, Siyasi ve İktisadi Yönleriyle Avrupa Bütünleşmesinde Son Gelişmeler ve Türkiye-AB İlişkileri- ATAUM 30. Yıl Armağanı, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, s. 129-150., R6. Oliver T. (2017) Fifty Shades of Brexit: Britain`s EU Referendum and its Implications for Europe and Britain?, The International Spectator, 52:1, 1-11, R 7. Carrera, S. Et. al., (2015) ?The EU`s Response to the Refugee Crisis Taking Stock and Setting Policy Priorities?, No. 20/16, R8. Copelovitch, M. Et. al., (2016), Four Lessons From the Eurozone Crisis- and why the Future of the Euro remains uncertain, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2016/10/07/four-lessons-from-the-eurozone-crisis/., R9. Baykal, S. (2004), Avrupa Birliği`nin Geleceği: Meşruiyet Sorunu, Anayasallaşma Süreci ve Bütünleşmenin Nihai Hedefi Üzerine, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 1, Sayı 1, s. 119-153, R 10. Servantia,D ve Ataç E. (2016), Britanya Referandumu Sonrası Avrupa`da Yükselen AB Şüpheciliği?, İKV Değerlendirme Notu,Sayı: 192., R11. Grabbe, H. (2014).Six Lessons of Enlargement Ten Years on: The EU`s Transformative Power in Retrospect and Prospect?, JCMS, Volume:52, 40-56, R12. Smith, K. (2005), ?The outsiders: the European Neighbourhood Policy?, International Affairs 81, 4, 2005, 757-773, R13. Müftüler-Baç, M. (2017). Turkey`s future with the European Union an alternative model of differentiated integration?, Turkish Studies, 18:3, 416-438
    Supplementary Book -
    Goals Main aim of this course is to analyse the main deepening steps and current developments in the European Union (EU) through a theoretical framework
    Content In the first part of the course; integration theories, main historical developments in the EU history and the EU institutional structure will be analysed. Second part of the course includes the current developments and crises of the EU namely the Brexit issue, migration crisis, Euro crisis and etc, enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy developments and flexible/ differentiated integration models .
  • Program Learning Outcomes
    • Program Learning Outcomes Level of Contribution
    1 Describes the theoretical and applied knowledge of the field of international relations in depth. 3
    2 Interprets basic international problems and current international developments with an interdisciplinary approach. 5
    3 Follows the scientific literature and current sources in the field of international relations. 3
    4 It develops strategy and policy recommendations based on theoretical approaches and research on international problems. 3
    5 Describes the theoretical and applied knowledge of the field of international relations in depth 3
    6 Uses the computer technologies necessary to conduct research, obtain and share information. -
    7 Uses acceptable diplomatic and academic English. -
    8 He/she can work individually and as a team member to solve problems arising in international relations. -
    9 It supports the universality of social and cultural rights, gains awareness of social justice, and protects the historical and cultural heritage. -
    10 He/she effectively conveys his/her views, research, and analysis on international relations to the public and higher authorities in written, oral and visual forms. -
    Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi  Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı  @   2017 - Webmaster