CANKIRI KARATEKIN UNIVERSITY Bologna Information System


  • Course Information
  • Course Title Code Semester Laboratory+Practice (Hour) Pool Type ECTS
    European Union Politics ULS514 FALL-SPRING 3+0 Fac./ Uni. E 7
    Learning Outcomes
    1-Analysis the EU crises and the developments in a theoretical framework.
    2-Evaluates the historical developments, institutional structure and policy making of the EU, taking into account the current developments.
    3-Interprets the reasons of the developments regarding the deepening and widening of the EU.
    Prerequisites -
    Language of Instruction Turkish
    Responsible Assoc. Prof. Hatice Yazgan
    Instructors -
    Assistants -
    Resources R1. Dinan, D. (2007). Fifty Years of European Integration: A Remarkable Achievement?, Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 31, Issue 5, R2- Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2002). Theorizing EU enlargement: Research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research?, Journal of European Public Policy 9:4, 500-528, R3. Akgül A.S. (2004). ?Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri Işığında Avrupa Bütünleşmesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 1, Sayı 1, s. 1-32, R.4 European Union, EU Institutions and Bodies, https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/institutions-bodies_en, R5. Aydın Düzgit, S. (2018). Avrupa Birliği?nin Dış İlişkilerinde Kuramsal Tartışmalar, Sanem Baykal et. al., (Der.), Hukuki, Siyasi ve İktisadi Yönleriyle Avrupa Bütünleşmesinde Son Gelişmeler ve Türkiye-AB İlişkileri- ATAUM 30. Yıl Armağanı, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, s. 129-150., R6. Oliver T. (2017) Fifty Shades of Brexit: Britain`s EU Referendum and its Implications for Europe and Britain?, The International Spectator, 52:1, 1-11, R 7. Carrera, S. Et. al., (2015) ?The EU`s Response to the Refugee Crisis Taking Stock and Setting Policy Priorities?, No. 20/16, R8. Copelovitch, M. Et. al., (2016), Four Lessons From the Eurozone Crisis- and why the Future of the Euro remains uncertain, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2016/10/07/four-lessons-from-the-eurozone-crisis/., R9. Baykal, S. (2004), Avrupa Birliği`nin Geleceği: Meşruiyet Sorunu, Anayasallaşma Süreci ve Bütünleşmenin Nihai Hedefi Üzerine, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt 1, Sayı 1, s. 119-153, R 10. Servantia,D ve Ataç E. (2016), Britanya Referandumu Sonrası Avrupa`da Yükselen AB Şüpheciliği?, İKV Değerlendirme Notu,Sayı: 192., R11. Grabbe, H. (2014).Six Lessons of Enlargement Ten Years on: The EU`s Transformative Power in Retrospect and Prospect?, JCMS, Volume:52, 40-56, R12. Smith, K. (2005), ?The outsiders: the European Neighbourhood Policy?, International Affairs 81, 4, 2005, 757-773, R13. Müftüler-Baç, M. (2017). Turkey`s future with the European Union an alternative model of differentiated integration?, Turkish Studies, 18:3, 416-438
    Supplementary Book -
    Goals Main aim of this course is to analyse the main deepening steps and current developments in the European Union (EU) through a theoretical framework
    Content In the first part of the course; integration theories, main historical developments in the EU history and the EU institutional structure will be analysed. Second part of the course includes the current developments and crises of the EU namely the Brexit issue, migration crisis, Euro crisis and etc, enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy developments and flexible/ differentiated integration models .
    Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi  Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı  @   2017 - Webmaster