CANKIRI KARATEKIN UNIVERSITY Bologna Information System


  • Course Information
  • Course Title Code Semester Laboratory+Practice (Hour) Pool Type ECTS
    Comparative Constitutional Review SKY518 FALL-SPRING 3+0 Faculty E 8
    Learning Outcomes
    1-Analyse the intellectual and legal basis of the emergence of Constitutional Courts.
    2-Analyse the role of constitutional courts based on example countries.
    3- Evaluate the duties and powers of the Turkish Constitutional Court.
    4-Evaluate the discussions about Turkish Constitutional Court.
  • ECTS / WORKLOAD
  • ActivityPercentage

    (100)

    NumberTime (Hours)Total Workload (hours)
    Course Duration (Weeks x Course Hours)14342
    Classroom study (Pre-study, practice)14570
    Assignments3013535
    Short-Term Exams (exam + preparation) 1011010
    Midterm exams (exam + preparation)2013030
    Project0000
    Laboratory 0000
    Final exam (exam + preparation) 4014545
    0000
    Total Workload (hours)   232
    Total Workload (hours) / 30 (s)     7,73 ---- (8)
    ECTS Credit   8
  • Course Content
  • Week Topics Study Metarials
    1 The Birth of the Constitutional Judiciary R2. pp. 1-21
    2 Constitutional Judgment Models: European Model and American Model. R2. pp. 21-40
    3 Constitutional Judgment Models: European Model and American Model. R1. pp. 1068-1070
    4 American Supreme Court. R4. pp. 159-184
    5 Germany Federal Constitutional Court-  Italian Constitutional Court. R4. pp. 77-116, 184-198, 152-159
    6 French Constitutional Council - Spanish Constitutional Court. R4. pp. 198-211
    7 Establishment of the Turkish Constitutional Court (Structure, method of determining members, qualifications sought in members, term of office, etc.). R1. pp. 1081-1095
    8 The Working Procedure, Duties and Authorities of the Turkish Constitutional Court. R1. pp. 1166-1170
    9 The norms subject to the Supervision of the Turkish Constitutional Court and the scope of the constitutional review. R1. pp. 1099-1111
    10 Audit by Case (Abstract Norm Inspection) and Objection (Constant Norm Inspection) in the Constitutional Court. R1. pp. 1134-1152
    11 Individual Application in the Constitutional Court. R1. pp. 1152-1165
    12 Turkish Constitutional Court Decisions, Binding and Impact. R1. pp. 1171-1232
    13 The legitimacy of the constitutional judiciary. R3. pp. 131-166
    14 The legitimacy of the constitutional judiciary. R3. pp. 131-166
    Prerequisites -
    Language of Instruction Turkish
    Responsible Dr. Öğr. Üyesi İnci ÇOBAN İNCE
    Instructors

    1-)Doktor Öğretim Üyesi İnci Çoban İnce

    Assistants -
    Resources S1. Gözler, K. (2019). Türk Anayasa Hukuku, Ekin. S2. İba, Ş. ve Kılıç, A. (2019). Anayasa Yargısı Dersleri, Turhan Kitabevi. S3. Gözler, K. (2006). "Anayasa Yargısının Meşruluğu", Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, (131-166). S4. Ergül, O. (Ed.). (2005). Demokrasi ve Yargı, TBB Yayınları, Ankara.
    Supplementary Book -
    Goals In a comparative perspective, it is the grasp of the role of the Constitutional Courts.
    Content Conceptual Framework: Concept of Sovereignty, Forces division, Constitutional superiority, Constitutional Judgment. Birth of the Constitutional Judiciary and its functions. Turkish Constitutional Court Decisions, Binding and Impact. Constitutional Judgment in Comparative Law.
    Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi  Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı  @   2017 - Webmaster